A Simple Treatment to Stabilize Incisors After Luxation or Avulsion
Home
/
/
A Simple Treatment to Stabilize Incisors After Luxation or Avulsion

A Simple Treatment to Stabilize Incisors After Luxation or Avulsion

INTRODUCTION

After traumatic injuries to teeth, such as luxation or avulsion, stabilization is of prime importance. Conditions for splints include:

  1. Passive, not active, force on a tooth
  2. Allowing for physiologic tooth movement
  3. No harm to soft tissue
  4. Not adversely affecting the occlusion
  5. Allowing for endodontic treatment to be performed if needed
  6. An easy-to-clean tooth
  7. Ease in removing from the tooth1,2

The most common treatment is the use of a flexible splint. Various materials are used, and the treatment is basically the same.3 Another treatment to stabilize the tooth after avulsion is suturing the tooth in place.4 Bleeding is often present, and the blood, as well as saliva, will make the adhesion between teeth and any resin difficult. Pediatric patients are often crying and fearful and can be challenging to manage through the sustained trauma of a long dental appointment. One must treat the traumatic tooth as quickly and concisely as possible.

Methods

This is the current protocol that we are using in these situations:

  • Stabilize the tooth with light-cured resin (Light Fix [Sun Medical Co Ltd])
  • Take an impression
  • Create a vacuum-formed retainer (hard-type, 1.0-mm thickness)
  • Deliver the retainer within 8 hours after trauma
  • Keep the retainer on all day except when brushing teeth (28 days)
  • Check the mobility of the tooth after 1, 7, 14, and 21 days
  • In the case of luxation, taking an electric pulp test (EPT) (scale 1 to 10) after 1, 7, 14, and 21 days
  • Checking the mobility of the tooth, percussion, palpation, and probing and taking an EPT and a periapical radiograph after 28 days

CASE REPORTS

Case 1

The patient was a 5-year-old girl who fell on top of a water bottle while drinking and avulsed the deciduous left lateral incisor. Her childcare worker washed the tooth with tap water and cleaned the dirt off the tooth, removing the periodontal membrane. The tooth was replanted and stabilized by a light-cured resin, and an impression was taken. She returned to the dental clinic 3 hours later and received a vacuum-formed retainer. Her mother was instructed that her daughter should wear the retainer all day except when brushing her teeth. The tooth was checked after 1, 7, 14, and 21 days, and a dental radiograph was taken after 28 days. Endodontic treatment was performed after the tooth was stable. A 12-month followup was within normal limits (Figure 1).

incisors
Figure 1a. Preoperative intraoral photograph.
incisors
Figure 1b. Avulsed tooth
Figure 1c. Intraoral photograph; the tooth was replanted and fixed by light-cured resin.
incisors
Figure 1d. Working model with a vacuum- formed retainer.
Figure 1e. Intraoral photograph wearing the vacuum-formed retainer.
Figure 1f. Intraoral photograph at 28 days postoperative.
Figure 1g. Pre-op radiograph.
Figure 1h. Radiograph immediately after replanting.
Figure 1i. Radiograph at 28 days post-op.
Figure 1j. Radiograph of root canal filling.
Figure 1k. Intraoral photograph at 12 months post-op.
Figure 1l. Radiograph at 12 months post-op.
Figure 1m. Intraoral photograph at 18 months post-op.
Figure 1n. Radiograph at 18 months post-op.

Case 2

This patient was  a 24-year-old female. She had fallen, causing lateral luxation of her maxillary left central incisor. The next morning, she came to the office, where it was stabilized by a light-cured resin, and an impression was taken. Six hours later, she returned and received a vacuum-formed retainer. She was instructed to wear the retainer all day except when brushing her teeth. Sensitivity tests were performed after 1, 7, 14, and 21 days. Mobility of the tooth and palpation were checked, an EPT was done, and a dental radiograph was taken after 28 days. The tooth had +1 mobility in the labial-palatal direction and no reaction to the EPT. Three months later, the tooth was restored and responded to an EPT (8/10). At the 4-month recall, the tooth responded to EPT (4/10). At 5 months, a sinus tract was noted. The tooth did not respond to the EPT. A lesion at the apex was seen on the radiograph. The diagnosis was pulp necrosis, and root canal treatment was performed in 2 visits. One month later (6 months after the trauma occurred), the sinus tract disappeared, and the radiograph showed the process of healing (Figure 2).

Figure 2a. Pre-op intraoral photograph of displacement.
Figure 2b. Pre-op radiograph of displacement.
Figure 2c. Intraoral photograph of the replanted tooth.
Figure 2d. Intraoral photograph. The tooth was fixed with light-cured resin.
Figure 2e. Working model with a vacuum-formed retainer.
Figure 2f. Intraoral photograph. Wearing a vacuum-formed retainer.
Figure 2g. Radiograph immediately after replanting.
incisors
Figure 2h. Intraoral photograph at 28 days post-op.
Figure 2i. Radiograph at 28 days post-op.
Figure 2j. Intraoral photograph at 3 months post-op.
Figure 2k. Radiograph at 3 months post-op.
Figure 2l. Intraoral photograph at 5 months post-op; the sinus tract was present.
Figure 2m. Radiograph at 5 months post-op; the apex of the tooth had a lesion.
Figure 2n. Intraoral photograph at 6 months post-op; the sinus tract was gone.
Figure 2o. Radiograph at 6 months post-op; the apex of the tooth shows healing.

Case 3 

A 42-year-old female fell, causing palatal luxation of her maxillary left central incisor. An alveolar bone fracture on the palatal side was seen in the CBCT. The fracture was reduced and stabilized by a light-cured resin, and an impression was taken. Two hours later, she returned and was given a vacuum-formed retainer. She was instructed to wear the retainer all day except when brushing her teeth. It was notable that she had a tongue-thrusting habit. Sensitivity tests were performed after 7 and 28 days. Mobility of the tooth, an EPT, palpation, and a dental radiograph were taken after 28 days. At the 28-day followup, there was slight mobility of the tooth and no reaction to the EPT. At the 2-month followup, the tooth was not discolored, had no mobility, was negative to EPT, and was slightly sensitive to percussion. There was no periapical lesion on the radiograph and no sinus tract. At the 3-month followup, the tooth was responsive to EPT (9/10) and had slight percussion pain. At the 4-month followup, the tooth was responsive to EPT (9/10) and no longer percussion-sensitive (Figure 3). 

Figure 3a. Pre-op intraoral photograph of displacement.
Figure 3b. Pre-op radiograph of displacement.
Figure 3c. CBCT scan of the alveolar fracture of the palatal bone.
Figure 3d. Intraoral photograph. The tooth was replanted and fixed by light-cured resin.
WhatsApp